 |
| Hilltops HC Tom Sargeant studies play in a CJFL game on Aug. 17. |
The Saskatoon Hilltops will deal with the trickle down
effects of the CFL’s rule changes as they come.
On Monday, Canada’s professional circuit announced some
major rule changes. Starting in 2026, the famous rouge has been altered.
No points will be awarded for missed field goals, punts and
kickoffs that go through the end zone via either through the air or a bounce.
If a returner fields any of those types of kicks in the end zone and is tackled
in the end zone or kneels down in the end zone, a single point rouge will be
scored.
A 35-second play clock will replace the 20-second play clock
in 2026. Next year once a play is blown dead, a 35-second play clock begins.
Also in 2026, team benches at all CFL stadiums will be on opposite sides of the
field.
In 2027, the field of play will change. The field of play
between the goal-lines will be 100 yards instead of 110 yards. The depth of the
end zones will shrink from 20 yards to 15 yards.
The width of the field will still be 65 yards. The uprights
will be moved from the goal-line to the back of the end zone.
Legendary Hilltops head coach Tom Sargeant had up and down
feelings about the changes.
“I understand and respect the reason why they want to move
the goalpost,” said Sargeant, who has guided the Hilltops to 14 CJFL title wins
as head coach. “I think that is a safety element.
“Everything we’ve done when you look at the game of football
with literature is trying to make the game a safer place. I think they’re trying
to make it more Americanized. Do I agree with all the things, no I don’t, but
you know right now that is professional sport.
“I coach amateur football. Hopefully, it doesn’t affect us
and we can keep doing what we’re doing, because obviously for the blue and
gold, it has worked out pretty well.”
Hilltops star fifth year defensive tackle Johnathon Stevens
went to training camp with the Saskatchewan Roughriders and was on their
practice roster until the time arrived for him to be assigned back to the Hilltops.
The Eatonia, Sask., product has a fondness for how the game is now, but he
believes CFL commissioner Stewart Johnston is trying his best to move the game
forward.
“It is a little tough for me,” said Stevens. “All the
respect to the commissioner there.
“He is trying to improve the league and do what he can do to
help out there and help grow the game and make it more exciting for the fans,
obviously. I have mixed feelings, but ultimately, it is not up to me with what
happens. I do know no matter what the Canadian game is going to be great no
matter what happens.”
As for the change in the field size, Stevens said you just
have to adjust to it. He said the three players currently on the Hilltops
roster that were born in the United States in receiver/safety Isaiah
Vallderruten, running back David Collins and receiver David Boyd Jr. have all
adapted to playing the larger Canadian sized field, so that adaptation can work
going the other way.
“I’ve only ever played on one size of field there,
obviously,” said Stevens. “If it came down to it, what else can you do.
“You’d have to adapt to it, and obviously, get used to new
things as the Americans here. They had to get used to our field, so we’ll see
how it goes.”
CFL rule changes gave Yausie new work
 |
| Jeff Yausie works the sidelines as the Hilltops DC on Aug. 17. |
The CFL’s incoming rule changes created some unexpected
homework for Jeff Yausie.
Yausie had been focusing on his role as the defensive
coordinator for the CJFL’s storied Saskatoon Hilltops reviewing video of their
52-26 victory over the Edmonton Wildcats at Emerald Hills Regional Park in
Sherwood Park, Alta. That all changed on Monday morning when the CFL announced
some major rule changes, and Yausie had to jump into action as the CEO of
Football Saskatchewan in gathering information and having meetings about the
changes.
Yausie said the staff at Football Saskatchewan didn’t have
any idea the CFL rule changes were coming on Monday. One of the meetings
included talking with Saskatchewan Roughriders president and CEO Craig
Reynolds.
“I had meetings with Craig (Reynolds) from the ’Riders, and
they were told to keep it top secret until the announcement, which totally
makes sense,” said Yausie. “It was a complete surprise for us.
“Even Football Canada had received word like the night
before at the last second, so there was not a lot of consultation across the
players association and the amateur football. Obviously, it was a really
well-organized announcement. They did their homework.
“They had some real good graphics and stuff to explain the
changes and the differences.”
While the new rules will see the CFL change to a field that
is 100 yards in length between the end zones as opposed to the current 110
yards, Yausie doesn’t think the CFL is moving to a version of the sport that
more resembles what is played in the United States.
“I really don’t,” said Yausie. “To me, the only changes to
make it more American football are 100-yard field and goalposts to the back of
the end zone.
“I like goalposts to the back of the end zone, and I like
100-yard field. I think it’ll turn into more scoring, which is what their
analytics told them. For us and the rest of the changes, I think you have to
change and grow to get better and to keep up with the times.
“We’re excited about that. The concern is the change to the
field sizes and how that affects amateur football. That is going to take time
for that to figure out.”
Yausie said he was happy the changes that are coming in are
staggered for 2026 and 2027. He added it would take more time in the amateur
football world to change facilities and believes those changes could take five
to 10 years before everyone adjusts. For teams that play in CFL stadiums,
Yausie said they would be affected the most.
He believes it is possible that Football Canada might follow
the CFL as far as rule changes go.
“I think they could,” said Yausie. “We’ll certainly analyze
it as far as the rule changes that were made, not the field sized ones, but the
rule changes to start.
“The good thing is the CFL is a professional league. We can
analyze what they’re doing, and we can see if it works, if it doesn’t work. If
it is great, then we’ll adopt and change.
“I think some of that will happen.”
Yausie admits it is also a challenge to secure money for
sports facilities in Canada, so that exists as a hurdle when it comes to changing
fields.
“For sure, dollars for sports is a huge concern,” said
Yausie. “The cool part is in Saskatchewan we love our six-a-side football, our
nine-a –side football and our 12-a-side football.
“Football is football. I don’t care what the field size is. They
didn’t touch the 65-yard width, which is huge.
“They didn’t touch the downs like three-down football we
are. They didn’t touch a yard off the ball. To me, it is really not
Americanizing Canadian football.”
Reaction to CFL rule changes more mixed than
I thought
 |
| Andrew Harris in action for the Winnipeg Blue Bombers in 2017. |
The CFL rule changes avoided the deal breaker.
As a result, the reaction I’ve seen to the incoming rule
changes is more mixed than I thought. To me, the reaction has been about 55 per
cent negative and 45 per cent understanding. In my subjective view, it has been
way more even than I expected.
I think the deal breaker would have been had the CFL elected
to become a four-down game as opposed to sticking to three downs. Having three
downs to gain 10 yards is the most defining characteristic of the Canadian game
of football.
Had there been a change to four downs, I could envision the
two CFL stronghold franchises in the Saskatchewan Roughriders and Winnipeg Blue
Bombers losing half of their season ticket holders going into the 2026
campaign.
The CFL approached the rule changes with great skill. They
highlighted the changes to the rouge. I think half of the fans of the Canadian
game did not want any points to be given for balls that were kicked through the
end zone – especially for missed field goals.
The alterations that were made to the rouge were something
that most to all CFL fans could agree to. From there, the CFL eased into the
other changes like adjusting the play clock and field dimensions.
The CFL approached the rule changes like skilled
politicians. You make a change in the law or a program everyone pretty much can
agree to and you proceed to add changes to other laws and programs people might
be wary of after that.
With that approach, the CFL got a sizable number of people
who felt OK with the rule changes.
As far as bringing in a 35-second play clock is concerned, I’ve
had football people tell me there are consistency issues with the 20-second
play clock regarding how officials allow teams to substitute in players. Those
issues aren’t major ones and were something that was being dealt with in
organizational meetings in the sport.
For myself, I still don’t like the rule changes, but they
are not deal breakers that will make me decide to stop going to games. I will
still go to CFL games.
Had they made it even more like the game in the United
States, I wouldn’t like the changes, but I would still go for the curiosity
factor. I also find I like football in all its forms including the flag and
touch games.
I think the changes that were made open doors for the CFL to
possibly get a television contract or streaming service contract in the United
States and possibly expand again to the United States. I think the changes will
help sell the league to legal gambling partners and possibly make it easier to
get a video game done.
I haven’t gambled on any type of sports in years. With that
noted, I realize the sports industry makes big money on gambling, and I think
it is likely way more money than I originally thought.
I know in Canada the notion is there about expanding the CFL
to Quebec City or Halifax, N.S.
However, I can see the CFL looking to the United States,
because it is easier to do business there. To build any sort of sports
facilities in Canada including potential stadiums in Quebec City and Halifax,
those looking to build often rely on getting grants from the Government of Canada.
Currently, the Government of Canada ties those grants to promises of the new
facilities that are powered by green energy to a certain extent and are
environment friendly.
Actually to be realistic, the Government of Canada makes the
sports industry jump through various hoops in ways that parallel most other
industries in the country.
In the United States, sports are a major industry. To use a
metaphor, sports in the United States is a big-boss table that includes kings
and queens, while Canada’s sports industry is a baby in a high-chair.
I think the CFL could use expansion to the United States as
a way to leverage better business environments for its franchises in Canada.
I know almost all professional football circuits that have
operated in the United States not named the NFL have failed. Still, I can see
why the business people in the CFL would look in that direction. The current
rule changes still keep the essence of the Canadian game, and I can see the
business crew in the CFL thinking that could still be a great selling point
there.
I also note that while I hate the CFL rule changes I don’t
get overly emotional about it, and I don’t let it affect my life. I don’t own a
team, so I have no control over what happens to that circuit.
It is an entertainment option. One day I might decide it
doesn’t work for me anymore, and at that point, I will no longer be someone
that buys tickets to games or merchandise.
I won’t pout or get upset or act like a bratty baby. I will
just leave and go on to something else.
At this point, the CFL still works for me as an
entertainment option.
If you have any
comments you would like to pass along about this post, feel free to email them
to stankssports@gmail.com.
-------
If you like what you
see here, you might want to donate to the cause to keep independent media like
this blog going. Should you choose to help out, feel free to click on the
DONATE button in the upper right corner. Thank you for stopping in.